I finally have an opportunity to put my first review up.
Last night I got to see M. Night Shyamalan’s newest movie, Signs.
Please note: if durning the course of the review, I discuss anything that might be spoilerish, I will use Inviso-Text (patent pending). If you decide to read the spoilerish text simple hightlight the Inviso-Text (pantent pending) to view. If you have not seen the movie I would strongly urge you to not read the Inviso-Text
Mel Gibson stars as a family man who discovers crop circles in his corn field. However, this movie isn’t really about crop circles. Instead, Shyamalan use the backdrop of the movie, (Inviso-Text on) an alien invasion to discuss spiritual issues like chance, pre-destination, and faith. It is a rather interesting combination that makes for a entertaining movie.
I found the beginning of the movie to be slow and dull, but I found some of Shyamalan’s other movies (The Sixth Sense and Unbreakable) to be the same way. At many points during the beginning of the movie, some scenes seem overly staged. Shyamalan is known for his storyboarding of movie, in this case, he may have gone overboard. However, you need that time to get ready for the rest of the movie. After (Inviso-Text) the dog of death scares the crud out of everyone there is very little time to breath. Shylamalan takes a page from Hitchcock’s book and uses suspence to keep the audience from breathing for most of the movie (It is about as suspenceful as Hitch’s Rear Window). To create the suspenceful and erie mood of the movie, the movie makers don’t show the threat for most of the movie. The faceless enemy is far more frightening than one seen. The music, by James Newton Howard (channeling Bernard Herman, another Hictchcock favorite), is effective in increasing the sense of suspence, but most effective are the times of silence with no music at all.
Surprisingly there is a humorous element to the movie, which was probably added to reduce the number of heart attacks durning the movie. These little times come to let the audience breath again, however, occasionally I found them distracting, especially when all this work was done to set the mood and then it is completely broken because of a corny joke and is it just me, but doesn’t the army recruiter seem totally out of place?
The final momments of the movie destroy some of the momments that the movie has strived to set up. (Inviso-Text) Why did he have to show the alien at the end? It would have been much more frightening if he would have left the alien out. However, the Shyamalan trade mark twist didn’t really pay off for me. It seems as though Shyamalan had written himself into a cornor and had to find a way out. Not to mention that many will notice similiarities between Signs and The Panic Room.
An impressive element of this film is the sound editing. Surround sound is effectively used to creep the audience out. Go see it in a theater with a decent sound system.
One thing that I really enjoy about this movie is it takes a typical sci-fi story, alien invasion, and looks at it from a different perspective. Most alien invasion stories, like Independence Day, from a world-wide view, the story zooms from one location to the other. However, in Signs, the story is a very personal one. The story is told from the perspective of a family and does not vary from that much. The story is not concerned with how the world deals with this crisis, just this one family. It is a nice change of pace.
The movie on a whole is very entertaining and I would like to go see it again just to watch other people react to the movie.
Entertainment/Artistic Grade: B
World Veiw: C (Some cursing, the movie however brings spiritual issues to the forefront and takes what I consider a positive view on predestination, unlike Minority Report.)
SreenIt: Signs
Read the review at Christianity Today.
Read the review at Entertainment Weekly.
Read the review at People.